By making a statute requiring all citizens to marry to have a marriage certificate issued by a county clerk, this in itself has given the citizens “due process” rights under the U.S. Constitution’s 5th Amendment as applied to the states by the 14th Amendment.
Therefore, by refusing to issue marriage licenses to straight & gay persons, Davis has violated her oath of office to uphold Kentucky law or violated due process. That is a crime called official misconduct in Kentucky for which she should be arrested.
In addition, as the couples complained to the federal court that their due process was violated & the judge ordered Davis to stop violating due process & she refused, he rightly held her in contempt. She was released because her assistant clerks legally issued the licenses in her absence, as the Kentucky law allows.
Now that she has altered the documents that Kentucky law says she must use, as they by law are issued by another state agency, she has actively interfered with the federal judge’s order not to interfere.
402.100 Marriage license — Marriage certificate. “Each county clerk shall use the form prescribed by the Department for Libraries and Archives when issuing a marriage license”
Arguments about whether or not marriage licenses issued by Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis’s assistant clerks are valid are nonsense as Kentucky statute specifically states that;
“Any duty enjoined by law or by the Rules of Civil Procedure upon a ministerial officer, and any act permitted to be done by him, may be performed by his lawful deputy”
There is no requirement that the deputy has to have the permission of the clerk to perform their duties.
Kentucky Statute – 61.035 Deputy may act for ministerial officer. Any duty enjoined by law or by the Rules of Civil Procedure upon a ministerial officer, and any act permitted to be done by him, may be performed by his lawful deputy.
However, there is a state law that makes it a crime for an official to refuse to perform their statutory duty.
Kentucky Statutes 522.020 and 522.030 deal with official misconduct in the first and second degree, respectively. “A public servant is guilty of official misconduct in the first degree when, with intent to . . . deprive another person of a benefit, knowingly . . . refrains from performing a duty imposed upon him by law or clearly inherent in the nature of his office or violates any statute or lawfully adopted rule or regulation relating to his office,” .
Official misconduct in the first degree is a Class A misdemeanor and is punishable with imprisonment not to exceed 12 months and fines of $500. Official misconduct in the second degree is a Class B misdemeanor and carries a potential punishment of up to 90 days imprisonment and fines of $250.
Kentucky Statute makes it the county clerk’s duty to issue marriage licenses.
Kentucky Statute 402.080 Marriage license required . No marriage shall be solemnized without a license therefore. The license shall be issued by the clerk of the county [emphasis added]
Therefore, the County Sheriff and Attorney would be within their authority and duty to arrest and charge Kim Davis for failure to perform her sworn duty to uphold the law and issue marriage licenses, either for straight or gay couples. She after all, has committed this crime.
Kentucky county clerk-gay marriage license conflict presents many complex issues for court and stateSeptember 3, 2015
UPDATE: 9/13/15 Davis was let out of jail after five days by the federal Judge Dunning after her clerks issued marriage licenses to straight and gay couples without her name on them, only in the name of Rowan County & conditioned it on her not interfering with her assistant clerks and the assistant clerks giving him a status report every two weeks. She will return to work on 9/14/15 & will be jailed if she interferes with her assistant clerks. She was not asked and did not promise not to interfere.
UPDATE: 9/4/15 Attorneys for Rowan County clerk Kim Davis filed a petition to the Kentucky Supreme Court for an emergency order protecting her from being fired until her lawsuit against Gov. Steve Beshear is resolved Rowan County Attorney formally requested that the state government charge Davis with misconduct, the first step in ousting her from her post.
KRS 522.020 and KRS 522.030 deal with official misconduct in the first and second degree, respectively. “A public servant is guilty of official misconduct in the first degree when, with intent to obtain or confer a benefit or to injure another person or to deprive another person of a benefit, knowingly commits an act relating to his office which constitutes an unauthorized exercise of his official functions or refrains from performing a duty imposed upon him by law or clearly inherent in the nature of his office or violates any statute or lawfully adopted rule or regulation relating to his office,” according to KRS 522.020.
Official misconduct in the first degree is a Class A misdemeanor and is punishable with imprisonment not to exceed 12 months and fines of $500.
Official misconduct in the second degree is a Class B misdemeanor and carries a potential punishment of up to 90 days imprisonment and fines of $250.
UPDATE: 9/4/15 David’s husband quoted her from jail stating
“It’s a matter of telling [Federal Judge] Bunning he ain’t the boss”
and “God’s moral law conflicts with my job duties.”
When asked if she would resign, her husband stated: “God no!” This is a clear statement that she will NOT follow the law in the U.S. and will continue even to defy a court order. The judge needs therefore to punish her appropriately with the maximum punishment for contempt of court and her continued disrespectful attitude toward the judge and court – jail until she is removed from office or states she will comply with the law. The assistant clerks, except for Davis’ son, who states he is Catholic.
9/2/15 – Kim Davis, a Kentucky Rowan County Clerk and Apostolic Christian, is refusing to do her job and issue marriage licenses regardless of sexual preference. She states that because she wants to avoid discrimination charges, she has refused since June to issue any marriage licenses. Now as she violated a federal court order to do her job and issue the marriage licenses as well as refused to not interfere with the assistant clerks issuing the licenses, the federal judge had no choice but to put her in jail.
She could get out of jail by resigning or by agreeing to allow an assistant clerk to issue the licenses, but she refuses because the form has ner name on it. Other states such as Hawaii have on line forms. The legislature or Chief Executive of the county could allow the assistant clerk or chief executive to put their name on the form. The state could write an “opt-out” law that states that if she feels her religious faith is compromised in her job, that another person can be assigned to do it such as the assistant clerk or chief executive.
Presently the marriage licenses issued by the assistant clerks should be valid as they are authorized by the county chief executive who is allowed to act in her stead while she is unavailable. He should then issue a memorandum to her documenting that he has acted for her records, making the issuance of the licenses legal.
Under Kentucky law, a county clerk’s job includes issuing marriage licenses. Now, regardless of sexual preference, gay couples may obtain marriage licenses in Kentucky, as the U.S. Supreme Court declared that laws barring gay marriage are unconstitutional, including a Kentucky law barring gay marriage. Therefore, under Kentucky law both gay and straight couples are qualified to apply for a marriage license, if they meet other qualifications as to age, residence, etc. So, Davis is refusing to do the job as court clerk, for which she is paid $80,000 per year.
As a public official, Davis is supposed to abide by the law and perform her public duties, which are issuing marriage licenses to qualified couples. She took an oath of office to abide by and enforce Kentucky and U.S. law.
A judge cannot refuse to follow the law to impose a death penalty when the law of the state requires it, even if he religiously opposes it. The governor of a state who is anti-gay cannot deny government benefits to a gay person. A police officer cannot refuse to protect a gay person being beaten up by an anti-gay person, or help a person flying the confederate flag at a rally who is ill and about to faint. Either do your job or resign. What is she thinking? She is not above the law!
Davis is claiming that she should get the same accommodations as the Governor has afforded Kentucky Attorney General Conway. Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway cited his own moral beliefs last year when he refused to defend the state’s gay-marriage ban in the federal appeals courts, without being criticized by Beshear. As an accommodation for his religious beliefs, Beshear hired private attorneys to replace Conway. No official has issued an order allowing Davis to be substituted by another person due to her religious objections to performing her job.
The issues in this case are actually complex and have legal subtleties that are hard for some lay persons to understand:
1. Davis can claim discrimination against Gov. Beshear for failing to have a procedure whereby employees will be substituted in their jobs when they have a religious objection to performing their job. She has filed this issue as a federal suit against Gov. Beshear which is pending.[i] She claims discrimination and violation of Kentucky’s religious-freedom law for failing to have a similar procedure to substitute someone else to do her job concerning issuing gay marriage licenses.
However, the Attorney General’s job to appeal or prosecute is legally discretionary so that there is no consequence to him if he refuses to do this job. Davis’ job duties are mandatory and not discretionary, so legally she is committing official misconduct for refusing to perform the duties of her job.
2. Citizens who have been refused marriage licenses, gay and straight, can claim Davis is refusing to do her job, thus violating their due process rights to marry, and obtain a court order (injunction) forcing her to do her job. The federal district court has issued a temporary injunction ordering Davis to issue marriage licenses to gay and straight couples – i.e. perform her job.
Four couples, two gay, two straight, have been refused marriage licenses and have sued Davis and Rowan Count Kentucky in federal court for failure to do her job, violating their civil rights, which through the Fourteenth Amendment include the Fifth Amendment right to due process (read lawsuit here http://www.aclu-ky.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Rowan-complaint.pdf.) The right to marry became a matter of due process when a Kentucky State Statute was codified regarding procedures to obtain a marriage license and barring marriage without a license.
402.080 Marriage license required — Who may issue.
No marriage shall be solemnized without a license therefor. The license shall be issued by the clerk of the county in which the female resides at the time, unless the female is eighteen (18) years of age or over or a widow, and the license is issued on her application in person or by writing signed by her, in which case it may be issued by any county clerk.
Therefore, citizens have been granted a codified procedure, or due process, by the State of Kentucky, in regards to marriage. This fact allows these couples to go to federal court and seek relief, or an injunction ordering the countyclerk, Davis, to do her job.
3. Purposeful failure to do your job as a public servant is the Class A misdemeanor crime of official misconduct under Kentucky law. No one has made a criminal complaint against Davis as of this date, so she has not been arrested under state law.
4. Davis is paid by all tax-payers of the county as an elected official to do her job, as a representative of the state. God does not control the law. The fact that she refuses to issue marriage licenses to anyone and also that she was just jailed for defying a federal court order to do her job proves misconduct.The Rowan County Chief Executive officer has the option to, as he Gov. Beshear did with the Kentucky Attorney General before, appoint a substitute to perform this duty and decide to request Kentucky House of Representatives to impeach and to remove Davis for misconduct.
The Kentucky House of Representatives should move expeditiously to remove Davis from office. A new Clerk must be appointed, or the Rowan County Chief Executive could decide to allow the assistant clerks to substitute for the elected clerk in cases where there is a religious objection to performing a statutory prescribed job. She should also be impeached and lose her salary and benefits, for collecting a salary but not doing your job cheats the tax-payers of the state.
5. The Kentucky House of Representatives could also impeach Davis for refusing to do her job because this is the crime official misconduct. In addition, this might mean that she not only loses her job and $80,000 salary, but also her benefits and retirement.
Gov. Beshear has stated that he refuses to call the legislature back into session. They return to session in January 2016. So this route of removing her from office would take a while.
6. Kim Davis has all sorts of religious liberty rights secured under the First Amendment. But they are not relevant in this case in regards to doing her job. Accommodating her religious beliefs could be made into a new state law, which allows for higher officials substituting another person to do an official act, when a public servant feels the act conflicts with their religious beliefs. However, under federal law, this is not a civil right when the state interests out way religious interests, unless the state makes it a due process right by codifying the right to have someone else appointed, on a limited basis, to do her job in the case of religious conflict into law.
All she is asked to do with couples that come before her is certify that they have met the state requirements for marriage. So her religious opposition to same-sex marriage is absolutely irrelevant in this context. What she is really doing is rendering her private religious beliefs public policy. So the same-sex couples in Kentucky are being asked to pay the price of her religious observance.
This affects other people not Davis. This is not a matter of religious freedom, under federal law; it is a matter of doing your job.
This is not the same as forcing Davis to fail to practice her religion by working on Christmas Day, which would violate her First Amendment rights to freedom of religion, but not affect others.
As Kentucky has no law against religious discrimination, if she had a private job or business, she would be allowed to discriminate. However, she is a public servant as a court clerk and cannot as a representative of the State discriminate against another person in providing services to them. If she has a religious objection to doing so, her only option is to resign, unless a higher official appoints someone specifically to substitute for her in performing this specific job when it conflicts with her religious belief.
These couples asked for a preliminary injunction from the federal court to force her to resign or issue the licenses. This was granted but stayed until the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the case by the Clerk to overturn the federal district court order, by Judge Bunning, for Davis to comply with the law.
The Kentucky Religious Freedom Act does not protect her. It is true that the state cannot unduly burden her religious beliefs. But it is also true that the state can subordinate your personal beliefs if there is a compelling state interest and the state is using the least restrictive means to carry out its objective. The state simply requires her signature on a form certifying that the couple meets the legal requirements to marry as set out by the state, which is not a profession of personal acceptance of gay marriage. This is not compromising her religious beliefs.
The only thing the county clerk does in regard to marriage is certify that they meet the qualifications under Kentucky law to obtain a marriage license and to issue the marriage license, as well as file the license once it is solemized by the appropriate minister or persons. Freedom of religion does not allow an official to disregard the law, who has sworn to uphold the law.
7. Davis has now defied a federal district court order, which is an act of contempt of court, to issue the licenses, [as well as now openly and contemptuously stated that she is above the law] so she was jailed for contempt of court by Federal District Court Judge Bunning. The assistant clerks have been told to promise to issue licenses and all but her son agreed to issue the licenses. They would also have been jailed for contempt if they refused to do their jobs. However, for unknown reasons, Judge Bunning did not jail Davis’ son, an assistant clerk, when he alone among the six assistant clerks stated that he also would refuse to issue gay persons marriage licenses. The federal court told them they do not need the Clerk’s approval to do their job.
The judge is also appropriately forcing the assistant clerks to do either their jobs and issue licenses or also go to jail for contempt. They do not deserve their salaries if they do not. The County Executive should fire any assistant clerk who fails to do his/her job. The County President should appoint a temporary clerk while Davis is jailed, as she is absent and unvailable to do her job. The County Executive is authorized to issue marriage licenses in her absence.
402.240 County judge/executive to issue license in absence of clerk.
In the absence of the county clerk, or during a vacancy in the office, the county judge/executive may issue the license and, in so doing, he shall perform the duties and incur all the responsibilities of the clerk. The county judge/executive shall return a memorandum thereof to the clerk, and the memorandum shall be recorded as if the license had been issued by the clerk.
There must be some law as to replacing an official who is temporarily incapacitated and unable to do their job.
Davis refused to agree not to interfere with the assistant clerks issuing marriage licenses, so Dunning, as a result ordered Davis jailed for contempt until she either resigns or agrees to do her job or not interfere with the assistant clerks doing their job and issuing licenses.
Fundamentally, this is the bottom line:
The issue is not about religious freedom; it is about a government official who has violated her oath of office to uphold the law and issue marriage licenses, which is her mandatory statutory duty. Outside of her job she can choose to personally discriminate against gays, but she must either resign or do her job. She has committed a crime under state laws in failing to uphold her oath of office and do her job. As such, she should be arrested and impeached and forfeit her job and its benefits.
The state could mitigate the consequences by passing a law allowing for automatic substitution for limited specific reason of conflict with religious belief when an employee of the State preforms a job, but they have not done so and Gov. Beshear has not chosen to call the legislature back into session or request that they act on this issue.
Freedom of religion does not mean that you can refuse to do your government job based on religious belief. If Davis is so rigid to believe that religion dictates the law of this land, despite the First Amendment, then she should resign. If she refuses to resign, then she should be impeached and forfeit her job and retirement for violating her oath of office to uphold the laws.
[i] Davis filed a federal lawsuit, in U.S. District Court, where she blamed Gov. Beshear for instructing the state’s 120 county clerks to comply with the U.S. Supreme Court decision in June striking down Kentucky’s same-sex marriage ban and legalizing gay marriage nationwide. Her suit claims that Beshear should have let Davis and other clerks opt out if they felt morally uncomfortable providing licenses to same-sex couples. A stay concerning her right to op-out due to religious preference in performing her job was lifted and her appeal of denial of this suit is pending.
Davis seeks protection under the state’s religious-freedom law, which is an issue under the Fifth Amendment as applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment of due process for her. It was passed by the Kentucky General Assembly in 2013 over Beshear’s veto. The law protects “sincerely held religious beliefs” from infringement unless there is “a compelling governmental interest.” Because her oath of office included the phrase “so help me God,” Davis said, she believed she never would have to “act in contradiction to the moral law of God.”
Trump is not a statesman. He is a comic, a clown, a narcissist, a bully, crude, a user of others for his own gain – which makes him a great member of the 1%, and is unelectable. He is all bluster and no substance. He says he will build a wall with Mexico and make Mexico pay for it. Really! Give us the details Donald! How are you going to pay for it in detail. So what if you built buildings and get investors to pay for them. Buildings are investments where investors can make a profit. A wall is not an investment. Who would lend him the $21 billion to build it? Name one major issue where he has given a detailed plan of exactly how he will raise the money, who he will deal with, how he will raise concensus, etc. You won’t be able to. Look at his web site – no details! Look at his supporters – the KKK and other white supremacists. Like Jindal says he hasn’t read the Bible, because he’s not in it.
Foreign policy – give me a break – he can’t even name the leaders of the factions in charge of the major terrorist groups in the Middle East! Seriously! He may be able to get investors together if it amounts to making money, but government’s purpose is not to make money. Yes it must raise taxes, help the private sector have the environment to raise money, but it does not raise money. He might be a good adviser to a private set of advisers hired to invest the money from the Social Security trust fund so that it grows like Canada’s system which is growing and in no danger of running out of money, but investing and diplomacy are apples and oranges. Negotiating an investment is a far cry from preventing a war.
He tries to make everything black and white, which is fine for an oligarch who runs a business and fires people. It is totally inappropriate and counterproductive if you are the leader of a free nation, where the Constitution says “we the people”, as there would only be Trump, not people if he becomes an elected official. Anyone who votes for him is a fool.
If he makes a third party – so what! Despite the media who says a third party will make the GOP lose automatically – I do not think so. He will crash and burn as he has no substance in terms of details that make sense concerning foreign policy, domestic policy, jobs, the 99% including increasing the middle class, etc. I would love to see him as a debater between Clinton and either Rubio or Kasich or Bush. The other two will crush him in a real debate. You simply can’t make so many gaffs and claims you cannot support, as well as insult and denigrate so many groups of people, and then be taken seriously enough to act as a true elected leader.
The best thing for the GOP would be if the they as a party and the networks exclude him from debates due to inappropriate language and behavior and if the press starts to ignore him, which probably won’t happen. He feeds on publicity.
There are too many questions still to be answered – this is a very disturbingly confused situation, suggesting a need for an in depth and thorough investigation
As a retired research pathologist and physician the Sandra Bland case is very disturbing to me.
Sandra Bland was arrested after an officer stopped her for not using a signal to change lanes and then, although legally but questionably as he had no reasonable basis to do so, told her to stop smoking and then got mad at her and made her get out of the car because she seemed to object to this request.
When she got out of the car and was verbally objecting to the officer’s requests, the officer then slammed her to the ground causing her to smash her head down. Then she complained she couldn’t hear, which indicates she suffered a concussion.
She told the officers she had epilepsy and was on a medication, Kepra.
The jail then claims she committed suicide by hanging three days later with a plastic bag.
Yes it is possible to hang yourself by leaning in after securing your hands so you cannot get the bag or rope away from suffocating you even without any drop. Many prisoners have killed themselves in this manner called “leaning in hanging”.
If the jail denied her the epilepsy medication, it is possible that she died from a seizure as the medication wore out of her system and then made her prone to a seizure. The stress of the situation and lack of medication could have contributed to having a seizure. Then they could have staged the hanging. If this was true, then there would be no bleeding after death around the ligature (plastic bag) which was around her neck and no petechiae (pin point hemmorhages). Petechiae however, are not always present with hanging or suffocation.
If she was strangled and then the hanging staged, the autopsy report, if it was done properly, should show that the ligature furrowing was concentric and not consistent with hanging. A hanging will have non-concentric furrowing as the ligature has more pressure on one side due to gravity.
There was also plant matter in her abrasions on her back, consistent with the day she was arrested, having been thrown to the ground and dragged. It is negligence for the jail not to have cleaned and treated her abrasions or allowed her to shower properly for three days to clean the wounds.
If the blood tests show she did not have her medication, then that also would be negligence, as lack of medication needed for epilepsy could have precipitated a seizure.
The reports say she told the officers she was suicidal, but the jail did not have her on a suicide watch. That would also be negligence. Suicide in jails often occurs during the first few days in jail as that is when the detainee is most upset about the situation. Ms. Bland certainly had reason to be upset as the circumstances of the arrest and slamming her to the ground seem excessive.
In addition, she had an unusually high amount of marijuana in her blood. Therefore, she was given a large amount of marijuana in the jail which she either ingested or smoked. That needs investigation. I am not an expert on effects of marijuana so I cannot comment on whether this can increase suicidal ideation or depression or if it can trigger seizures.
The autopsy does not prove she hung herself. There are too many questions still to be answered.
A senior well-known forensic pathologist, Dr. Cyril Wecht , who is also an attorney agrees with the above assessment during an interview on the radio here.
Gun control will do nothing. The horse is out of the barn. Americans own 50% of all civilian owned guns in the world. We need strict bullet control at least as serious as with driver’s licenses. Licenses of several levels like level one for limited # bullets for a 22. To own high capacity clips or clips for guns with more than one bullet at a time must have advanced level bullet certificates for mental health and from police every two years. To own high caliber bullets or clips with more than a few bullets you would have to have training similar to an officer. Licensees would also have to keep records of their bullets like pharmacists do with narcotics. How many they have, who they give or sell them to, how they were used (target practice, etc).
Louisiana has concealed carry everywhere and more guns per capita than almost any state. Where were the armed citizens here? They clearly could not react quick enough. They likely wouldn’t have been fast enough, accurate enough, and trained enough to counter panic in an active shooter situation.
Armed civilians do more harm than good. Studies have shown that practicing with a stationary target under calm conditions does not prepare you to duck, be aware of your surroundings and avoid tunnel vision of fight or flight situation where you fail to recognize innocent and shoot wildly, and without constant intense training, you do not have muscle memory to overcome the shakiness from stress hormones and fight or flight signals from nervous system removing blood from periphery and giving it to large muscles and center mass plus brain, as well as have the quickness and accuracy needed in a rapidly evolving active shooter situation with innocents running everywhere including in front of your gun. Armed civilians everhywhere will cause more death and injury, not less.
With guns, the only thing needed is a permanent ID embedded in some high tech way so that they can be traced more easily.
More bullets = more death. Less mental health care = more death. Remember 1/3 of 30,000 gun deaths in U.S. every year are suicides and 11% of population has mental health issues. You should be required to lock up bullets and loaded guns.
Raise support for Shelton, who is being attacked by corrupt Sheriff, judges, and Cook County & Illinois officials who want to shut her up for exposing corruptionJune 23, 2015
If you like this web site and support Shelton’s dedication to those who are abused by Cook County Courts please help bring crowds of people to support her against her unlawful arrest and the County’s malicious prosecution against her!
The Cook County Sheriff and States Attorney are continuing attacks and unlawful arrests against me (Dr. Linda Shelton) in order to shut me up, stop me from further exposing corruption among Cook County judges, police, and politicians, as well as in order to shut down my web sites exposing this corruption here, here, here, here, & here.
They have charged me with felony aggravated battery to an officer for, in a courtroom, allegedly “touching an officer’s ear” with no injury.
This brings a sentence of 3-14 years in prison if convicted. Yet, the State through the court disability coordinator knew before the court date that I have multiple physical disabilities and use a walker (including balance issues so when I’m push I reach out and grab with my hands to try and steady myself) as well as that I have post-traumatic-stress disorder due to being beaten by police. I gave her a letter from my psychiatrist who treated me with PTSD that states that I “misperceive ongoing events” if the PTSD flashbacks are triggered, that I cower and try to protect myself with my arms waving around my head! The courtroom sheriff staff purposely grabbed and pushed me inducing a flashback, then failed to “stand back” and give me time to “recover my mental equilibrium” and become aware of where I was, as recommended by my physician in this letter. The sheriff staff and judge knew this before court – purposely triggered a flashback and therefore knew I could not have conscious intent to “harm” and officer or make”insulting or provoking contact”. As this alleged crime would be a misdemeanor, since the “victim” was an officer, the SA raised the charge to a felony!!!
This was a violation of federal law as the court was REQUIRED to accommodate my disabilities as I requested and listen to my doctor’s letter.
PLEASE STAND UP FOR ME IN COURT AND SHOW YOUR OUTRAGE AT THIS KIND OF CONDUCT BY THE SHERIFF STAFF AND STATES ATTORNEY!
Come to court and stand in gallery to show support for Dr. Linda Shelton who writes this blog and several other blogs exposing Cook County Court, Sheriff and police misconduct and crimes including: http://cookcountyjudges.wordpress.com and http://chicagofbi.wordpress.com. Shelton needs a large grass roots effort to protect her so these web sites are not shut down. Show support for her fight against false arrest, excessive force, excessive sentencing, lack of rehabilitation, lack of restorative justice, illegal bond retention statute, unconstitutional battery statute, illegal procedures in divorce and probate court, wrongful theft of estates from elderly by court-appointed guardians.
Next hearing on case 12 CR 22504 is Sept. 30, room 506 at 10 am then instanter when motion for substitution of judge denied to room 506 2600 S California, Chicago, IL
We must stand together against the Cook County INJUSTICE SYTEM!!
Now they are trying to shut me up by charging me with felony battery for “touching an officer’s ear” during a PTSD flashback the officers triggered using information they received from the court disability coordinator – where I requested disability accommodations including not doing things that trigger flashbacks and backing-off if a flashback occurred until it passed as recommended by psychiatrist Dr. Robert Galatzer-Levy. The Cook County Courts pervasively refuse to accommodate litigants’ disabilities and use their disabilities against them.
Possible sentence up to 14 years is outrageous, disproportionate and unconstitutional. I also have motions challenging the bond retention statute as unconstitutional and the battery statute as unconstitutional. Come to court and stand in gallery – help me fill gallery – or the judge will blatantly violate the constitution and laws if there are few witnesses.
Help me get press coverage!! Help me please as much as possible get this covered.
Next hearing on case 12 CR 22504 is Sept 30, room 506 10 am 2600 S California, Chicago, IL
For more information read this blog post: https://cookcountyjudges.wordpress.com/2014/05/11/shelton-wrongfully-jailed-for-one-year-recently-released/
letter by Dr. Robert Galatzer-Levy: https://cookcountyjudges.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/psych-dr-galatzer-levy.pdf
Originally posted on Kids in the system:
In March 2007, the nonprofit Disability Law Center sued the state of Massachusetts over its treatment of hundreds of mentally ill inmates. Prisoners with emotional problems who are unruly in some way are kept in 23 hour solitary confinement, which, according to a November 10 Boston Globe article, has “led to self-mutilations, swallowing of razor blades, and numerous suicides.”
In response to these grave concerns the Patrick administration, in an out-of-court negotiation, proposed building special treatment units for mentally disturbed inmates. Now, that proposal is off the table; citing the budget crisis, those units will not be built. So it’s back to court in an effort to force the state to give its incarcerated citizens their constitutional protection against “cruel and unusual punishment.”
Massachusetts isn’t alone in facing the problem of caring for mentally ill inmates. Every state has had to confront this growing trend which started in the…
View original 1,080 more words
We need truth commission like in S Africa to expose corrupt courts stealing elderly and disabled estates
Originally posted on MaryGSykes.com:
If only we can get the grandma zombies to protect our elders from probate and locked down nursing homes?
Any film student want to write a plot for that one?
View original 537 more words